Research rigor
made clear.
MedQuiry evaluates whether a published medical study is methodologically sound — making between 200 and 2,000 determinations across design, bias, statistics, and conflicts. Score a study in under ten seconds.
>200
determinations / study
< 10s
median score time
0.0–10.0
MedQuiry score
Developed by physicians · Supported by AI · Audited by clinicians
Register · 1 free token
Score a study, on us.
Create a MedQuiry account to receive one free token. We will not ask for a credit card. Tokens never expire and are non-transferable.
Create account · Get free token See a live demo(opens in a new tab)Already have an account? Sign in.
By creating an account you accept the Terms and Privacy Policy.
Sample reportRUBRIC mq-1.8_2026-07-06
Journal article · 2026 · Target population: Adults (18–54)
Home based, tailored intervention to reduce rate of falls after stroke (FAST): randomised trial
Lindy Clemson, Katharine Scrivener, Natasha Lannin, Louise Ada, et al. · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2025-085519
Study credibility
HIGH
8.1
Synopsis of findings
This randomized trial evaluated a home-based intervention to reduce falls in stroke survivors. The intervention led to a 33% reduction in fall rate, with improvements in self-efficacy, mobility, and balance.Synopsis paraphrases the authors’ stated findings. MedQuiry does not endorse, confirm, or refute the conclusions of the study.
Why this score
The study scored highly due to its robust RCT design, comprehensive bias control measures, and adherence to CONSORT reporting standards. The absence of blinding for participants and therapists slightly reduced the bias control score. The study's relevance to the target population was low due to the older age of participants. The journal's high reliability contributed positively to the overall score.